Possible violations of global rights policy (last 11 months)

This query looks for actions in 2019 that should have been impossible, ignoring global groups. Many of these actions, therefore, are likely to violate the global rights policy of the English Wikipedia

Global false positives: staff, users who lost relevant user groups
Result set 1; Moves without redirect by users who shouldn't be able to do that. 
Known false positives: Known false positives: global rollbackers/stewards legitimately reverting page-move vandalism, moves in content models that don't support redirects.
----
Result set 2: Other admin actions by non-admins. Known false positives: Stewards doing bigdeletes
----
Result sets 3-5: Edits through non-semi protection that should have been impossible (No false positives known)
----
Result set 6: Violations of account creation rate limit (No false positives known)
----
This query is not intended to be exhaustive list, and there are many ways for the global rights policy to be violated without triggering this list.
A perfect query is literally impossible, as it cannot catch, ex., stewards viewing oversighted content, which is technically a violation but leaves no traces behind.
SQL

Checking query status...
